Evaluation of Corneal Alterations After Short-Term Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Use by Confocal Microscopy

Cem Şimşek; Cansu Kaya; Aylin Karalezli

doi:10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.27163

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To evaluate the corneal subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensitivity, and anterior segment alterations in short-term silicone hydrogel contact lens (SiHCL) users by confocal microscopy.

Materials and Methods:

The study included 25 right eyes of 25 male volunteers aged 25-30 years who had never used SiHCLs before. ocular surface disease index (OSDI), tear break-up time, Schirmer test, tear meniscus area, strip meniscometry tube, corneal sensitivity, and corneal subbasal nerve morphology were evaluated before and after 1 month of CL use.

Results:

OSDI was 10.6±1.1 before CL use and 17.2±1.2 after 1 month of CL use (p<0.01). Schirmer test distance was 16.3±2.3 mm before and 14.3±1.9 mm after 1 month of CL use (p>0.05). Tear film break-up time was 7.1±0.4 s before and 6.2±0.3 s after CL use (p>0.05). The tear meniscus area was 0.026±0.002 mm² before and 0.024±0.001 mm² after 1 month of CL use (p>0.05). Stripmeniscometry tube results were 5.4±0.9 mm before and 4.9±0.8 mm after 1 month of CL use (p>0.05). Corneal sensitivity values were 3.2±0.4 mm before and 2.95±0.3 mm after 1 month of CL use (p>0.05). Dendritic cell density evaluated by confocal microscopy was 14.84±3.1 cells/mm² before and 32.57±4.2 cells/mm² after 1 month of CL use (p<0.01). Subbasal nerve tortuosity was 0.92±0.2 before and 1.03±0.2 after 1 month of CL use (p>0.05). Subbasal nerve density was measured as 4726±310 pixels/frame before and 4570±272 pixels/frame after 1 month of CL use (p>0.05).

Conclusion:

After a month of SiHCL use, no significant changes were observed in tear secretion, corneal sensitivity, tear meniscus volume, subbasal corneal nerve density, reflectivity, or tortuosity, while a significant increase was found in OSDI and dendritic cell density.

Keywords:

Confocal microscope, contact lens, corneal sensitivity, subbasal cell density, ocular surface disease index

Introduction

With the rising myopia rates and improved comfort resulting from advances in contact lens (CL) technology, silicone hydrogel contact lenses (SiHCLs) are now widely used to eliminate refractive errors.¹ Although the use of CLs is advantageous for users in social terms, it is known to be associated with various complications, including ocular infections such as keratitis, which can cause permanent visual impairment.² Their frequent use in routine clinical practice has given rise to the need for further research on the effects of SiHCL use on the ocular surface, and the use of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in this context has steadily increased.

IVCM is a non-invasive imaging method that allows in vivo visualization of the ocular surface structure and is used both in the imaging of healthy corneas and in the diagnosis and follow-up of many corneal diseases.³ Dendritic cells are potent antigen-presenting cells that are considered an immune activation marker and have an important role in the regulation of the immune response.^4,5 IVCM also enables in vivo imaging of corneal dendritic cells, which are frequently seen throughout the subbasal nerve plexus layer.^6,7 Previous studies using IVCM have demonstrated changes in dendritic cell density in the corneal morphology in conditions that cause ocular surface pathology, such as dry eye, allergy, keratitis, keratoconus, and corneal dystrophies.^8,9 Anterior segment inflammation results in activation of Langerhans cells in the cornea and conjunctiva as part of the immune response.^10,11 In addition, dry eye-related symptoms can cause many patients to shorten the duration of soft CL use or completely stop using CLs altogether.¹² Previous studies reported reduced corneal sensitivity associated with CL use.^13,14 However, corneal sensitivity was shown to return to normal after discontinuing CL use.^15,16 Traditional CLs with low oxygen permeability (Dk) create a hypoxic environment in the cornea, resulting in decreased sensory nerve function.¹⁷ Other factors contributing to this loss of sensitivity include sensory adaptation and acidosis-suppressed sensory nerve function.^18,19 Most published studies were conducted with earlier generation CLs made of low-Dk materials. With new-generation SiHCLs, lens-induced hypoxia is considerably reduced or even eliminated. Changes in ocular surface sensitivity that may occur in this low hypoxic environment after short- and long-term SiHCL use are not fully known.²⁰

The use of SiHCLs is especially common in young adults, and investigating ocular surface changes in SiHCL users will provide guidance in solving the complications and problems caused by SiHCLs. The aim of this study was to evaluate dry eye findings, corneal subbasal nerve morphology, corneal sensitivity, and anterior segment changes after the short-term (1 month) use of SiHCLs.

Materials and Methods

Results

In this study, the OSDI score was found to be 10.6±1.1 before and 17.2±1.2 after 1 month of SiHCL use (p<0.01) (Figure 2). Schirmer test results at these two time points were 16.3±2.3 mm and 14.3±1.9 mm (p>0.05) (Figure 3a) and tear film break-up times were 7.1±0.4 s and 6.2±0.3 s, respectively (p>0.05) (Figure 3b). Tear meniscus area was 0.026±0.002 mm² before and 0.024±0.001 mm² after 1 month of SiHCL use (p>0.05) (Figure 4a), while SMTube values were 5.4±0.9 mm and 4.9±0.8 mm, respectively (p>0.05) (Figure 4b). Corneal sensitivity test values before and after 1 month of SiHCL use were 3.2±0.4 mm and 2.95±0.3 mm, respectively (p>0.05) (Figure 4c). On IVCM, dendritic cell density was determined to be 14.84±3.1 cells/mm² before and 32.57±4.2 cells/mm² after 1 month of SiHCL use (p<0.01) (Figure 5a). Subbasal nerve tortuosity was evaluated as stage 0.92±0.2 before and stage 1.03±0.2 after 1 month of SiHCL use (Figure 5b). Subbasal nerve density at the two time points was 4,726±310 pixels/frame and 4,570±272 pixels/frame (p>0.05) (Figure 5c) and subbasal nerve reflectivity was grade 1.73±0.3 and grade 1.66±0.2, respectively (p>0.05) (Figure 5d). A representative IVCM image of dendritic cells is shown in Figure 6. In brief, there were no statistically significant changes in tear secretion, corneal sensitivity, or tear meniscus volume after 1 month of SiHCL use compared to before SiHCL use in our study, whereas there was a statistically significant increase in OSDI. IVCM revealed no change in subbasal corneal nerve density, reflectivity, or tortuosity, while the increase in dendritic cell activation was found to be statistically significant.

Discussion

IVCM is a new, noninvasive imaging method that allows examination of the cornea at the cellular level and is frequently used both in healthy corneas and in the differential diagnosis and follow-up of many diseases. IVCM can provide high-resolution images of the corneal subbasal nerves and immune/inflammatory (dendritic) cells.²⁶ With the increasing clinical use of IVCM, many studies evaluating the subbasal nerves in the healthy and pathological cornea have been published.

In this study, we compared parameters such as OSDI score, tear break-up time, tear meniscus volume, Schirmer test results, corneal sensitivity, and corneal subbasal nerve morphology assessed before and after short-term (1 month) SiHCL use. Considering the previous literature, there is no study evaluating all of these parameters together in relation to short-term SiHCL use, thus the results of our study may be important. In our assessment after 1 month of SiHCL use, only the increases in dendritic cell activation and OSDI score were found to be statistically significant compared to before use. We observed no statistically significant changes in Schirmer’s test, tear break-up time, corneal sensitivity, or corneal subbasal nerve density. Previous research on similar subjects includes studies demonstrating higher dendritic cell density in the central cornea in people using CLs. Zhivov et al.²⁷ observed a higher number of Langerhans cells in the corneal epithelium of CL users compared to non-users. These cells are thought to migrate centrally as a CL-induced inflammatory response.^28,29 This result is consistent with previous animal model studies demonstrating migration of Langerhans cells into the cornea in response to the mechanical effect of CL.^30,31 In their study, Zhang et al.³² compared SiHCLs with low and high Dk value in a rat model and reported that the number of conjunctival dendritic cells increased more with the use of the low-Dk SiHCL. Similarly, two different studies led by Alzahrani et al.^33,34 showed that dendritic cell density was increased in people using soft CLs. These results may be an indicator of the inflammatory response in the cornea induced by the CL. Sindt et al.³⁵ proposed in their study that this dendritic cell activation could be due to CL-related ocular discomfort. Although we detected no statistically significant change in subbasal nerve density after short-term SiHCL use in this study, Liu et al.³⁶ reported lower nerve fiber density in CL users compared to non-users. However, they showed that there was no significant difference between CL users with and without dry eye. There are also studies in the literature showing increased dendritic cell activation in dry eye disease.³⁷ A report by Liu et al.³⁸ indicated that dendritic cell density gradually increased after starting CL use, reached a peak at week 4, and decreased after week 4. This suggests that ocular inflammation may be greatest at week 4. The decrease observed after week 4 may be associated with user adaptation and subsequent reduced CL-related discomfort.³⁹ Begley et al.⁴⁰ showed that most CL users had symptoms such as dry eye symptoms, itching, irritation, photosensitivity, pain, and blurred or variable vision.We believe the reason for the high OSDI scores after SiHCL use in our study was due to complaints that may occur with initial use, similar to the study by Begley et al.⁴⁰

Previous studies have shown that the most important causes of CL-related dry eye are hypoxia, inflammation, infection, and mechanical effects.^41,42 CLs are foreign bodies that cause clinical or subclinical inflammation of the ocular surface.^43,44 This response may be due to mechanical irritation, hypoxia, and mediator release. Both the inflammation from CL-related dry eye and the inflammation induced by the CL itself may lead to increased dendritic cell density. At the same time, this situation may also be influenced by feelings of ocular discomfort caused by the CL, considering the increase in OSDI score. With long-term use, we believe this inflammation and dendritic cell activation will decrease due to adaptation.

Corneal sensitivity is very important to ensure the maintenance of a healthy ocular surface. The corneal epithelium becomes more susceptible to external factors if there is a decrease in the blink reflex or tear volume due for any reason. Excessive evaporation and cooling lead to increased tear osmolarity. The reduction in tear volume and this increase in osmolarity stress the ocular surface epithelium, resulting in local inflammation and peripheral nerve damage.⁴⁵ Local inflammation and nerve damage can cause short- and long-term genetic and molecular changes in primary sensory neurons.⁴⁶ Sensory nerve terminals are densely and superficially located between epithelial cells on the corneal surface. Therefore, corneal surface nerves are easily affected by environmental factors (air pollution, low humidity), trauma (cataract and refractive surgery), and ocular surface diseases (pterygium, conjunctivochalasis, keratoconus).^47,48 In this study, we observed no change in corneal sensitivity after short-term SiHCL use.

In addition to corneal subbasal nerve density, other morphological parameters most frequently evaluated include nerve tortuosity, reflectivity, and beading.^49,50 Our results showed no changes in these parameters, which may be because the mechanical exposure to the subbasal corneal nerves in the short 1-month period did not have any effect on neural degeneration and regeneration.

Conclusion

This study used objective procedures to investigate changes in ocular surface and corneal subbasal nerve structure variables related to the use of a SiHCL that is frequently used in daily practice. In conclusion, our study provides useful data on the anatomical effects of short-term SiHCL use on the ocular surface and corneal subbasal nerves, and may guide future studies designed to evaluate the long-term effects of CL use.

Study Limitations

Limitations of our study are that all participants were men, we used a single type of CL material, the study sample was small, and the results do not include longer term follow-up. Expanding the number of people in this study and creating a new group using a CL of a different material may allow a better comparison and lead to different results.

References

Vitale S, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL 3rd. Increased prevalence of myopia in the United States between 1971-1972 and 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1632-1639.

Stapleton F, Keay L, Jalbert I, Cole N. The epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84:257-272.

Kocabeyoğlu S, Mocan MC, İrkeç M. In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Findings of Subepithelial Infiltrates Associated with Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis. Turk J Ophtalmol. 2015;45:119-121.

Hamrah P, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Dana MR. Novel characterization of MHC class II-negative population of resident corneal Langerhans cell-type dendritic cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:639-646.

Niederkorn JY, Peeler JS, Mellon J. Phagocytosis of particulate antigens by corneal epithelial cells stimulates interleukin-1 secretion and migration of Langerhans cells into the central cornea. Reg Immunol. 1989;2:83-90.

Villani E, Baudouin C, Efron N, Hamrah P, Kojima T, Patel SV, Pflugfelder SC, Zhivov A, Dogru M. In vivo confocal microscopy of the ocular surface: from bench to bedside. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39:213-231.

Zhivov A, Stave J, Vollmar B, Guthoff R. In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of Langerhans cell density and distribution in the normal human corneal epithelium. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005;243:1056-1061.

Yamaguchi T, Hamrah P, Shimazaki J. Bilateral Alterations in Corneal Nerves, Dendritic Cells, and Tear Cytokine Levels in Ocular Surface Disease. Cornea. 2016;35 Suppl 1:S65-S70.

Şimşek C, Doğru M, Kojima T, Tsubota K. Current Management and Treatment of Dry Eye Disease. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2018;48:309-313.

Rowden G. The langerhans cell. Crit Rev Immunol.1981;3:95-180.

Suzuki T, Sano Y, Kinoshita S. Conjunctival inflammation induces Langerhans cell migration into the cornea. Curr Eye Res. 2000;21:550-553.

Brennan NA, Efron N. Symptomatology of HEMA contact lens wear. Optom Vis Sci. 1989;66:834-838.

Epstein AB. Contact lens care products effect on corneal sensitivity and patient comfort. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:128-132.

Murphy PJ, Patel S, Marshall J. The effect of long-term, daily contact lens wear on corneal sensitivity. Cornea. 2001;20:264-269.

Millodot M. Effect of hard contact lenses on corneal sensitivity and thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1975;53:576-584.

Millodot M. Effect of the length of wear of contact lenses on corneal sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1976;54:721-730.

Millodot M, O’Leary DJ. Effect of oxygen deprivation on corneal sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1980;58:434-439.

Polse KA. Etiology of corneal sensitivity changes accompanying contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978;17:1202-1206.

Brennan NA, Bruce AS. Esthesiometry as an indicator of corneal health. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68:699-702.

Situ P, Simpson TL, Jones LW, Fonn D. Effects of silicone hydrogel contact lens wear on ocular surface sensitivity to tactile, pneumatic mechanical, and chemical stimulation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:6111-6117.

Irkec MT; Turkish OSDI Study Group. Reliability and validity of Turkish translation of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) in dry eye syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:408.

Kojima T, Dogru M, Kawashima M, Nakamura S, Tsubota K. Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of dry eye. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2020:100842.

Simsek C, Kojima T, Nakamura S, Dogru M, Tsubota K. The Effects of Rebamipide 2% Ophthalmic Solution Application on Murine Subbasal Corneal Nerves After Environmental Dry Eye Stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4031.

Simsek C, Kojima T, Nagata T, Dogru M, Tsubota K. Changes in Murine Subbasal Corneal Nerves After Scopolamine-Induced Dry Eye Stress Exposure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019;60:615-623.

Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N. Morphology of corneal nerves using confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2001;20:374-384.

Hamrah P, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Dana MR. Alterations in corneal stromal dendritic cell phenotype and distribution in inflammation. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1132-1140. Erratum in: Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1555.

Zhivov A, Stave J, Vollmar B, Guthoff R. In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of langerhans cell density and distribution in the corneal epithelium of healthy volunteers and contact lens wearers. Cornea. 2007;26:47-54.

Hazlett LD, McClellan SM, Hume EB, Dajcs JJ, O’Callaghan RJ, Willcox MD. Extended wear contact lens usage induces Langerhans cell migration into cornea. Exp Eye Res. 1999;69:575-577.

Sankaridurg PR, Rao GN, Rao HN, Sweeney DF, Holden BA. ATPase-positive dendritic cells in the limbal and corneal epithelium of guinea pigs after extended wear of hydrogel lenses. Cornea. 2000;19:374-377.

van Klink F, Alizadeh H, He Y, Mellon JA, Silvany RE, McCulley JP, Niederkorn JY. The role of contact lenses, trauma, and Langerhans cells in a Chinese hamster model of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:1937-1944.

Szliter EA, Barrett RP, Gabriel MM, Zhang Y, Hazlett LD. Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced inflammation in the rat extended-wear contact lens model. Eye Contact Lens. 2006;32:12-18.

Zhang Y, Gabriel MM, Mowrey-McKee MF, Barrett RP, McClellan S, Hazlett LD. Rat silicone hydrogel contact lens model: effects of high- versus low-Dk lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2008;34:306-311.

Alzahrani Y, Pritchard N, Efron N. Changes in corneal Langerhans cell density during the first few hours of contact lens wear. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016;39:307-310.

Alzahrani Y, Colorado LH, Pritchard N, Efron N. Longitudinal changes in Langerhans cell density of the cornea and conjunctiva in contact lens-induced dry eye. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100:33-40.

Sindt CW, Grout TK, Critser DB, Kern JR, Meadows DL. Dendritic immune cell densities in the central cornea associated with soft contact lens types and lens care solution types: a pilot study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:511-519.

Liu Q, McDermott AM, Miller WL. Elevated nerve growth factor in dry eye associated with established contact lens wear. Eye Contact Lens. 2009;35:232-237.

Tuisku IS, Konttinen YT, Konttinen LM, Tervo TM. Alterations in corneal sensitivity and nerve morphology in patients with primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:879-885.

Liu Q, Xu Z, Xu Y, Zhang J, Li Y, Xia J, Wang Y, He X, Qu J, Hu L. Changes in Corneal Dendritic Cell and Sub-basal Nerve in Long-Term Contact Lens Wearers With Dry Eye. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46:238-244.

Mcmonnies CW. Psychological and other mechanisms for end-of-day soft lens symptoms. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90:175-181.

Begley CG, Caffery B, Nichols KK, Chalmers R. Responses of Contact Lens Wearers to a Dry Eye Survey. Optom Vis Sci. 2000;77:40-46.

Chalmers RL, Wagner H, Mitchell GL, Lam DY, Kinoshita BT, Jansen ME, Richdale K, Sorbara L, McMahon TT. Age and other risk factors for corneal infiltrative and inflammatory events in young soft contact lens wearers from the Contact Lens Assessment in Youth (CLAY) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:6690-6696.

Stapleton F, Marfurt C, Golebiowski B, Rosenblatt M, Bereiter D, Begley C, Dartt D, Gallar J, Belmonte C, Hamrah P, Willcox M; TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort. The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: report of the subcommittee on neurobiology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:TFOS71-97.

Efron N. Contact lens wear is intrinsically inflammatory. Clin Exp Optom. 2017;100:3-19.

Saliman NH, Morgan PB, MacDonald AS, Maldonado-Codina C. Subclinical inflammation of the ocular surface in soft contact lens wear. Cornea. 2020;39:146-154.

Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, Bonini S, Gabison EE, Jain S, Knop E, Markoulli M, Ogawa Y, Perez V, Uchino Y, Yokoi N, Zoukhri D, Sullivan DA. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017;15:438-510. Erratum in: Ocul Surf. 2019;17:842.

Basbaum AI, Bautista DM, Scherrer G, Julius D. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pain. Cell. 2009;139:267-284.

Guthoff RF, Wienss H, Hahnel C, Wree A. Epithelial innervation of human cornea: a three-dimensional study using confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Cornea. 2005;24:608-613.

Gallar J, Acosta MC, Gutiérrez AR, Belmonte C. Impulse activity in corneal sensory nerve fibers after photorefractive keratectomy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4033-4037.

Tuominen IS, Konttinen YT, Vesaluoma MH, Moilanen JA, Helintö M, Tervo TM. Corneal innervation and morphology in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2545-2549.

Benítez-Del-Castillo JM, Acosta MC, Wassfi MA, Díaz-Valle D, Gegúndez JA, Fernandez C, García-Sánchez J. Relation between corneal innervation with confocal microscopy and corneal sensitivity with noncontact esthesiometry in patients with dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:173-181.

This page is for health professionals only.