Correlation Between Ciliary Sulcus Diameter and IOL Master Measurements in Patients with Cataract
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 376-379
December 2011

Correlation Between Ciliary Sulcus Diameter and IOL Master Measurements in Patients with Cataract

Turk J Ophthalmol 2011;41(6):376-379
1. Saglik Bakanligiıstanbul Egitim Ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Göz Klinigi, Istanbul,?Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 16.03.2011
Accepted Date: 16.07.2011
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Pur­po­se:

To determine the mean sulcus diameters in patients older than 50 years with senile cataract and to analyze the correlations of sulcus diameters with IOLMaster measurements of corneal diameter (white to white), axial length, keratometry and anterior chamber depth.

Methods:

31 eyes of 20 consecutive patients who were scheduled for cataract operation were included in the study. The same person performed routine ophthalmological examination, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) and IOLMaster measurements. Keratometry, corneal diameter, anterior chamber depth and axial length were measured with IOLMaster. Horizontal and vertical sulcus diameters were measured from iris pigment epithelium to iris pigment epithelium on the best UBM images in terms of centralization.

Results:

Mean patient age was 71.03±8.6 (min: 51, maks: 89) years. Mean vertical sulcus diameter was 13.59±0.73, mean horizontal sulcus diameter was 13.36±0.72 mm, and the mean of horizontal and vertical sulcus diameters was 13.47±0.71 mm. Mean corneal diameter was 11.67±0.46 mm, mean keratometry was 43.86±1.46 D, mean axial length was 23.2±0.93 mm, and mean anterior chamber depth was 3.02±0.35 mm. There were statistically significant correlations between horizontal corneal diameter and horizontal sulcus diameter (r: 0.37; p<0.05), horizontal corneal diameter and mean sulcus diameter (r: 0.36; p<0.05), axial length and horizontal sulcus diameter (r: 0.56; p<0.05), axial length and vertical sulcus diameter (r: 0.56; p<0.05), and axial length and mean sulcus diameter (r: 0.57; p<0.05). The correlations between other parameters were not statistically significant.

Conclusion:

The sulcus diameters measured in our study were higher when compared to other studies in the literature. Only corneal diameter and axial length were correlated with sulcus diameters. The strongest association in our study was between axial length and sulcus diameters. (Turk J Ophthalmol 2011; 41: 376-9)