The factors effecting the surgical success in concomitant esotropia
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 453-461
November 2009

The factors effecting the surgical success in concomitant esotropia

Turk J Ophthalmol 2009;39(6):453-461
1.
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 07.08.2009
Accepted Date: 19.08.2009
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To determine the preoperative factors effecting the operation success in patients with concomitant esotropia.

Method:

75 patients with concomitant esotropia operated in Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital Ophthalmology Clinic between January 2004- December 2007 were included in the study. The strabismus unit records of the patients who were included in the study were surveyed retrospectively. The results were analyzed by using Chi-square test. The surgical success was defined as a squint of 10 Δ or less during far fixation.

Results:

The operative success ratio was 64%. The factors inquired for their effects on the operative success were gender, refractive error, angle of squint, the existence and amount of amblyopia, the existence of anisometropia, the existence and type of fusion, the existence and depth of stereopsis, the age of onset of squint, the age at the time of surgery, the duration and the type of squint. As a result of statistical analyses, while no statistically significant effect of gender, angle of squint, anisometropia, the age of onset of squint and the type of squint on the success of the operation were identified (p>0.05); significant effects of visual acuity, refractive error, the existence of fusion and stereopsis, duration of the squint and the age at the time of surgery were identified (p

Discussion:

We consider that the use of preoperative squint angle as the only criteria in planning the surgery is not enough and determination of new criterias regarding the new studies is required.

Keywords:
Concomitant esotropia, operation success

References

1
Miller, S, J.H. Parsons&rsquo G&oumlz Hastaliklari Atlas Tip Kitap&ccedil
2
Esodeviations, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Chapter VII;, Esodeviations, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Chapter VII
3
Ali Sefik Sanaç, Sasilik ve Tedavisi. 2. Baski Ankara 2002-235
4
Kutschke PJ, Scott WE, Kech RV, Anisometric ambliopia. Ophthalmology. 1991,98-258
5
Denny M, Daniel J, Pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology 2003,1-9
6
Mims JL, Treff G, Wood RC, Variability of strabismus surgery for acquired esotropia. Arch Ophthalmol 1986,104-1780
7
Anderson RL, Holds JB, Does anyone know how to differantiate a functional defect from a cosmetic one. Arch Ophthalmol.1990,108
8
Erdöl H, Imamoglu H, I. Sasilik cerrahisinde basariyi etkileyen fakt&oumlrler. T&uumlrk Oftalmoloji Gazetesi. 2000,30-192
9
Yasar T, Simsek S, Horizontal konkomitan sasiliklarda cerrahi sonu&ccedillarinin sasilik tipi, derecesi ve cerrahi tekni-gi ile iliskisi. MN Oftalmoloji 2002,9-70
10
Senerkek E, nlü M, K. Konkomitan horizontal sasilik olgularinda cerrahi tedavi sonu&ccedil-293
11
Kampanartsanyakom S, Surachatkumtonekul T, The outcomes of horizontal strabismus surgery and influencing factors of the surgical success. J Med Assoc Thai 2005,88-94
12
Keenan JM, Willshaw HE, The outcome of strabismus surgery in childhood ezotropia. Eye 1993,7-341
13
Sener C, Abbasoglu , Sener C, Abbasoglu &Ouml-196
14
Altintas G, Altiparmak E, Duman S, Sasilikta reoperasyon gerektiren olgularin sonraki ameliyat basarilarinin incelenmesi. MN Oftalmoloji 2000,7-179