Review

Recent Advancements in Gene Therapy for Hereditary Retinal Dystrophies

10.4274/tjo.41017

  • Ayşe Öner

Received Date: 07.01.2017 Accepted Date: 20.04.2017 Turk J Ophthalmol 2017;47(6):338-343

Hereditary retinal dystrophies (HRDs) are degenerative diseases of the retina which have marked clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Common presentations among these disorders include night or colour blindness, tunnel vision, and subsequent progression to complete blindness. The known causative disease genes have a variety of developmental and functional roles, with mutations in more than 120 genes shown to be responsible for the phenotypes. In addition, mutations within the same gene have been shown to cause different disease phenotypes, even amongst affected individuals within the same family, highlighting further levels of complexity. The known disease genes encode proteins involved in retinal cellular structures, phototransduction, the visual cycle, and photoreceptor structure or gene regulation. Significant advancements have been made in understanding the genetic pathogenesis of ocular diseases, and gene replacement and gene silencing have been proposed as potentially efficacious therapies. Because of its favorable anatomical and immunological characteristics, the eye has been at the forefront of translational gene therapy. Recent improvements have been made in the safety and specificity of vector-based ocular gene transfer methods. Dozens of promising proofs of concept have been obtained in animal models of HRDs and some of them have been relayed to the clinic. The results from the first clinical trials for a congenital form of blindness have generated great interest and have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of intraocular administrations of viral vectors in humans. This review summarizes the clinical development of retinal gene therapy.

Keywords: Gene therapy,hereditary retinal dystrophies,clinical studies

Gene Therapy in Hereditary Retinal Diseases

The concept of gene therapy emerged immediately after the discovery of DNA. The history of human gene therapy research goes back to the 1960s. However, initial attempts were unsuccessful due to a limited knowledge of gene expression and the inability to determine the best method for administering genetic material. Within the last 20 years, more than 1,500 clinical trials of gene therapy in various disease groups have been initiated.1,2,3,4,5

The eye is a common focus of gene therapy because it is a small, self-contained, and easily accessible organ with unique immunological properties. Furthermore, the noninvasive in vivo imaging techniques currently available enable fellow eyes to be used as controls for comparing treatment responses and outcomes, which provides a distinct advantage for gene therapy.6,7

Hereditary retinal dystrophies (HRD) are the disease group most studied in gene therapy research, though there is still no effective treatment. This rare disease group has an incidence of about 1/3,000. Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is the most common HRD. The group also includes Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), Stargardt macular dystrophy (SMD), Best’s macular dystrophy (BMD), and other even rarer retinal dystrophies. More than 200 genes are involved in the HRD disease group. There may be various mutations within the same gene, and these mutations may result in different phenotypes. This further complicates the genetic heterogeneity associated with these diseases. Recent advances have led to a better understanding of genetic pathogenesis and how gene therapies can be administered.8,9,10 Currently, gene therapy is implemented via vectors.


Vectors Used in Gene Therapy

The vectors used in gene therapy are classified into two types: viral and nonviral vectors.


Viral Vectors

Retroviruses: Retroviruses are a family of viruses with two single-stranded RNAs. The family includes seven genera: alpharetrovirus, betaretrovirus, gammaretrovirus, deltaretrovirus, epsilonretrovirus, lentivirus (LV), and spumavirus. Gammaretroviruses and more commonly LV have been used as retroviral vectors. The recombinant LV generated by eliminating many of the native viral genes has a large packaging capacity of 8 kilobases (kb), and can therefore carry multiple therapeutic proteins. It has also been shown that intraocular administration of LV does not stimulate an immune response. In addition, LVs can transduce and use the capsid glycoproteins of foreign viruses.11,12 Animal studies indicate that the subretinal use of LVs is safe in mice.12,13,14,15 However, these viruses have several disadvantages. LVs can lead to mutations in host cells. The production process of this vector is rather complicated and the end product is very large (~80-100 nm), which can affect its distribution in tissue.12

Adenoviruses: Adenoviruses are a family of virus with linear double-stranded DNA. There are 51 human serotypes of adenovirus, grouped from A to F. Viruses A2 and A5 in subgroup C are used in gene therapy and are nononcogenic. Adenoviruses do not affect the host cell cycle, and thus do not lead to cell death. Also, since the viral DNA does not integrate into the host cell’s genome, they do not cause mutagenesis in these cells. Adenovirus genes are stable in transduced cells, and they also have a large capacity. For these reasons, adenoviruses are a more attractive option for gene therapy. The virus is transformed into a vector by removing the sequences responsible for viral DNA replication. The packaging capacity can be increased based on the size of the removed section.16,17,18

Adeno-associated viruses (AAV): AAV is a parvovirus assisted by an adenovirus. Recombinant AAVs are currently the most frequently used virus in gene therapy. They show no pathogenicity and do not induce an inflammatory response. This is a major advantage in gene therapy. AAV contains a small DNA and its capacity is 4.7 kB. There are 9 serotypes of AAV (AAV1-AAV9). Of these, AAV2 is the most reliable and most efficiently transduces retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells.19,20 Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the utility of AAV as a gene therapy vector for LCA.21,22,23

Viral vectors have higher gene transfer efficiency compared to other vectors. Although AAV2 shows efficient transduction of RPE cells, studies are ongoing to identify new vectors that will effectively target other retinal cells, particularly photoreceptors. Furthermore, the available capacity of AAV2 is inadequate for the treatment of larger genes. Nonviral vectors developed through studies on vector capacity have increased the number of target genes, and genes such as CEP290 in LCA, ABCA4 in SMD, and MYO7A in Type 1 Usher syndrome are currently within capacity. Nevertheless, larger genes such as USH2A still exceed the available capacity. Alternative therapies are being investigated in order to overcome this problem, and DNA nanoparticles have been proposed as a possible solution.11,24


Nonviral Vectors

Nonviral factors were developed as the result of studies investigating vectors that were safer and had larger capacity than viruses. Among these, liposomes are the most studied. However, they were not found to be very effective in gene therapy culture studies.25,26

DNA nanoparticles developed as a result of studies on vector capacity are considered a potential solution to the capacity limitation. The capacity of DNA nanoparticles is 20 kb. This vector can carry the largest gene being studied, the USH gene, which is 15.6 kb in size and is responsible for Type 2A Usher syndrome. Studies have shown that these particles are safe when used in the lungs.27 Animal studies on their safety in the retina have also yielded favorable results. However, they are not as efficient for retinal cells as AAV, and therefore may require repeated subretinal injections.28,29,30,31


Administration of Gene Therapy

The eye is an ideal organ for gene therapy. Firstly, it is small and enclosed. A small amount of vector is sufficient, which minimizes any toxic effects related to the vector. Moreover, the tight junctions between the RPE cells and the blood-retina barrier give rise to ocular immune privilege. The privileged intraocular microenvironment results in local inhibition of immune responses. These unique features prevent dissemination of the vector beyond the eye, thus avoiding the development of any systemic reactions to the vector. This greatly reduces the risk of systemic side effects. As retinal cells are post-mitotic, persistent gene expression can be achieved without interaction between genes. The numerous retinal dystrophy animal models have accelerated the process of evaluating treatment efficacy in preclinical trials. The structure of the eye facilitates treatment follow-up. The ability to observe the retina directly as well as with various in vivo imaging modalities allows noninvasive evaluation of gene therapy efficacy both in animal models and in humans.32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40 In addition, the bilateral and symmetric nature of dystrophies allows one eye to be used as a control to assess the effect of treatment on disease progression. Easy surgical access to the eye makes it possible for genetic material to be delivered directly to the desired ocular layer and target cell mass. Intraocular administration is usually performed via two routes: intravitreal and subretinal. In intravitreal injection, the therapeutic agent is dispersed in the vitreous, exposing the anterior retinal layers to the agent. In subretinal administration, the vector is injected between the RPE and the neurosensory retina, creating small, reversible pockets of detachment called blebs in the process. Diffusion of the agent is limited with intravitreal delivery. The vitreous inhibits diffusion first, followed by the internal limiting membrane and inner retinal layers. Therefore, subretinal administration is a more effective route because the targeted cell groups are located in the outer retina layers. After standard vitrectomy, the vector is administered in approximately 0.1 mm of fluid using a 39- or 41-gauge subretinal cannula. A site far from the large vessels, inside or outside the vascular arcade is selected as the injection site. The injections can also be done near the fovea. Treatment-related complications are mostly related to the surgery. No systemic complications related to the vector were reported in clinical trials. Ocular side effects associated with surgery can include subconjunctival hemorrhage, stinging, pain, and irritation. Although vector-related side effects are rare, hyperemia, photophobia, or decreased vision may occur.12,30,41,42,43,44,45


Diseases in Which Gene Therapy Has Been Applied

Leber Congenital Amaurosis: LCA is a severe congenital retinal disease and is currently the most studied ophthalmologic disease in the field of gene therapy. Patients exhibit fundus signs, impaired light reflex, markedly reduced or absent response on electroretinography (ERG), and nystagmus. Vision loss starts at birth or within the first few years of life and results in total blindness during early adulthood. A number of gene mutations have been identified in LCA. To date, 20 different genes have been reported.26 One of these is RPE65 (a 65 kDa specific protein of retinal pigment epithelium), a gene that is expressed in RPE cells and encodes an isomerohydrolase which catalyzes the conversion of all-trans retinyl esters to 11-cis retinal. Without 11-cis retinal, opsins cannot capture light and convert it to electrical impulses. Loss of RPE65 disrupts the visual cycle, causing accumulation of retinyl esters in lipid droplets and an increase in lipofuscin granules in the RPE cells. The result is progressive retinal degeneration and loss of vision. Clinical trials of gene therapy for LCA have targeted RPE65 mutation.31,32

In mice with RPE65 gene mutation, AAV vector carrying this gene increases RPE transduction independently of disease stage. Injected RPE65 could be detected immunohistochemically even after 7 months. The treated mice showed normal retinal morphology and normal retinyl ester and rhodopsin (RHO) levels. Improvement of retinal functions was observed in ERG performed 2 months after treatment.33 Successful gene therapy outcomes depend on the presence of healthy photoreceptors.

Subretinal administration of AAV2 packaging the RPE65 gene provided retinal preservation and improved ERG responses in 1- to 2-month-old RPE65-knockout and rd12 mice.34

Gene therapy was also shown to provide visual improvements with a single injection in canine LCA2. Visual restoration began 2 weeks after injection, peaked at 3 months, and continued until 7 years.35,36 Studies conducted in various RPE65-mutant canine models have reported long-term improvements in vision and ERG findings.37,38,39,40 Although preclinical canine studies have shown safe outcomes, potential adverse effects such as dose-dependent retinal thinning may occur.41

RPE65-LCA clinical trials were initiated in 2007 following the encouraging results of animal studies. Clinical trials have demonstrated that AAV2-RPE65 gene replacement therapy is a surgically and immunologically safe treatment with no toxicity. Differences have been reported in terms of visual gains. This is related to the very severe vision loss caused by this disease.42 The longest outcomes reported in the literature to date includes data from 3 years of follow-up. The best results were achieved in young patients with better retinal responses. In a clinical trial of 5 patients followed for 3 years, visual and retinal functions were improved after a few months of treatment, and this improvement was maintained for 3 years. The patients showed reduced nystagmus frequency, improved multifocal ERG responses, and better fixation stability in microperimetry.43

Bainbridge et al.44 presented the 3-year outcomes of administering RPE65 packaged in rAAV2/2 in a phase I/II trial including 12 subjects. They reported increased retinal sensitivity but no significant difference in ERG findings. Three patients developed intraocular inflammation, while visual acuity deteriorated in 2 cases.44 In another phase I trial including 15 subjects, no systemic toxicity was observed and all patients showed varying degrees of improvement in visual acuity at the end of 3 years follow-up. Cone and rod sensitivity were increased in the treated eyes, while no differences were seen in the fellow eyes.45

A phase III study of AAV2/2-RPE65 gene therapy in patients about 3 years of age, supported by the Spark Therapeutics Biotechnology company, has been completed (NCT00999609). The study yielded successful outcomes, and in 2017 the same firm initiated procedures to obtain FDA approval for the drug, named voretigene neparvovec. The promising results in LCA clinical trials have led to gene therapy applications in other HRDs.

Retinitis Pigmentosa: Following the detection of genetic mutations in RP patients, studies related to gene therapy were initiated in these patients. There are two approaches to gene therapy in RP. The first approach is to package a normal copy of the affected gene into an AAV and administer by subretinal injection. The second approach is to inactivate the mutated gene.

RHO gene mutation was the first mutation detected in RP. The first approach to treatment aimed to accelerate proteosomal degradation in order to increase the function of the defective RHO gene. However, this method has not been successful in animal experiments conducted to date. Another alternative is treatment targeting RNA. The aim is to selectively destroy specific mRNA by using ribosomes to neutralize the mutant allele.46,47,48,49,50 Despite some success with this method in autosomal dominant (AD) RP, testing and therapeutically engineering all of the 120 different mutations identified in the RHO gene presents considerable economical and technical challenges.

Nagatsu et al.51 used rAAV to treat mutations in the cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) gene in patients with AD-RP. Intraocular administration of normal PDE in a mouse model preserved retinal functions and prevented photoreceptor degeneration. There have also been recent developments in gene therapy for X-linked RP. Mutation in the RPGTPase regulator gene (RPGR) has been detected in many X-linked RP patients. The RPGR gene is located on the X chromosome. Subretinal administration of RPGR packaged into AAV was shown to halt retinal degeneration in canine models.52

There are also studies of the RPE-expressed “human receptor tyrosine kinase MER” (MERTK) gene mutations seen in RP type 38. Subretinal administration of AAV2-MERTK in a mouse model prevented photoreceptor degeneration.53,54 Clinical trials in humans were initiated on the basis of consistent experimental results.

Stargardt Macular Dystrophy: SMD is a retinal degenerative condition caused by mutation in the ATP binding cassette subfamily member 4 (ABCA4; ABCR) gene. ABCA4 encodes the protein that allows the transmission of energy from photoreceptors. Mutation in this gene leads to photoreceptor degeneration and subsequent visual loss. Gene therapy trials in mice have yielded encouraging results. Naash55 reported that nanoparticle delivery of normal ABCA4 gene preserved vision in a mouse model of SMD.56

These results have also led to the initiation of human studies. Clinical trials targeting the ABCA4 gene mutation identified in SMD are ongoing (STGD1; NCT01367444).57

Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD): The complement regulatory protein CD59 reduces membrane attack complex formation, considered one of the causes of AMD, by 62%. CD59 delivered via gene therapy may prevent unregulated vascular growth.58

Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1 or sVEGFR-1) is a tyrosine kinase protein and inactivates proteins that cause vascular growth. In 2011, a clinical trial investigating subretinal administration of rAAV.sFLT-1 in wet AMD was initiated. The study included 9 patients (6 in the study group and 3 controls) and no drug-related side effects were observed. Four patients in the study group responded well, and it was reported that this treatment is safe and has potential in the management of AMD.59,60

Choroideremia: Choroidemia is an X-linked progressive retinal degenerative disease. Affected male subjects have reduced night vision, peripheral vision loss, and total vision loss in the sixth decade. Mutation in the choroideremia (CHM) gene is associated with this disease. Encouraging results in preclinical trials led to a clinical trial of vectorized (AAV-REP1) normal CHM injected into the subretinal space. Two of the 6 subjects showed early improvement of visual acuity which was maintained for 3.5 years. There was no improvement in the fellow eyes. After 3.5 years, there was visual gain of up to 21 letters (4 lines) in the treated eyes, while the control eyes showed vision reduction of up to 18 letters.61


Conclusion

Although the initial results of gene therapy seem promising, several questions remain to be answered. Viral vectors have higher gene transfer efficiency compared to other vectors. Although AAV2 shows good transduction efficiency for RPE cells, studies are ongoing to meet the need for vectors that effectively target other retinal cells, particularly photoreceptors. Furthermore, the endogenous 4.7 kb packaging capacity of AAV2 is inadequate for the treatment of larger genes. Nonviral vectors developed through studies on vector capacity have increased the number of target genes. As a result, expanded capacity vectors can now accommodate genes such as CEP290, ABCA4, and MYO7A, genes responsible for LCA, SMD, and Type 1 Usher syndrome, respectively. Nevertheless, larger genes such as USH2A still exceed the available capacity. Alternative therapeutic strategies such as DNA nanoparticles are currently being explored in order to circumvent this problem.


Ethics Peer-review: Internally peer-reviewed.Financial Disclosure: The author declared that this study received no financial support.
1.    Ku CA, Pennesi ME. Retinal Gene Therapy: Current Progress and Future Prospects. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2015;10:281-299.
2.    Trapani I, Banfi S, Simonelli F, Surace EM, Auricchio A. Gene Therapy of Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Prospects and Challenges. Human Gene Ther. 2015;26:193-200.  
3.    Sahel JA, Marazova K, Audo I. Clinical characteristics and current therapies for inherited retinal degenerations. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;5:a017111.
4.    Berger W, Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Neidhardt J. The molecular basis of human retinal and vitreoretinal diseases. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:335-375.
5.    Dalkara D, Sahel JA. Gene therapy for inherited retinal degenerations. C R Biol 2014;337:185-192.
6.    Trapani I, Puppo A, Auricchio A. Vector platforms for gene therapy of inherited retinopathies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2014;43:108-128.
7.    Sahel JA, Roska B. Gene therapy for blindness. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2013;36:467-488.
8.    Daiger SP, Bowne SJ, Sullivan LS. Perspective on genes and mutations causing retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:151-158.
9.    Liu MM, Tuo J, Chan CC. Gene therapy for ocular diseases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:604-612.
10.    Friedmann T. A brief history of gene therapy. Nat Genet. 1992;2:93-98.
11.    Cao H, Molday RS, Hu J. Gene therapy: light is finally in the tunnel. Protein Cell 2011;2:973-989.
12.    Trapania I, Puppoa A, Auricchio A. Vector platforms for gene therapy of inherited retinopathies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2014;43:108-128.
13.    Balaggan KS, Duran Y, Georgiadis A, Thaung C, Barker SE, Buch PK, MacNeil A, Robbie S, Bainbridge JW, Smith AJ, Ali RR. Absence of ocular malignant transformation after sub-retinal delivery of rAAV2/2 or integrating lentiviral vectors in p53-deficient mice. Gene Ther. 2012;19:182-188.
14.    Bartholomae CC, Arens A, Balaggan KS, Yanez-Munoz RJ, Montini E, Howe SJ, Paruzynski A, Korn B, Appelt JU, Macneil A, Cesana D, Abel U, Glimm H, Naldini L, Ali RR, Thrasher AJ, von Kalle C, Schmidt M. Lentiviral vector integration profiles differ in rodent postmitotic tissues. Mol Ther. 2011;19:703-710.
15.    Yanez-Munoz RJ, Balaggan KS, MacNeil A, Howe SJ, Schmidt M, Smith AJ, Buch P, MacLaren RE, Anderson PN, Barker SE, Duran Y, Bartholomae C, von Kalle C, Heckenlively JR, Kinnon C, Ali RR, Thrasher AJ. Effective gene therapy with nonintegrating lentiviral vectors. Nat Med. 2006;12:348-353.
16.    Cao H, Koehler DR, Hu J. Adenoviral vectors for gene replacement therapy. Viral Immunol. 2004;17:327-333.
17.    Benihoud K, Yeh P, Perricaudet M. Adenovirus vectors for gene delivery. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1999;10:440-447.
18.    Parks RJ. Improvements in adenoviral vector technology: overcoming barriers for gene therapy. Clin Genet. 2000;58:1-11.
19.    Hirsch ML, Agbandje-McKenna M, Samulski RJ. Little vector, big gene transduction: fragmented genome reassembly of adeno-associated virus. Mol Ther. 2010;18:6-8.
20.    Ehrhardt A, Xu H, Kay MA. Episomal persistence of recombinant adenoviral vector genomes during the cell cycle in vivo. J Virol. 2003;77:7689-7695.
21.    Cideciyan AV. Leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations and its treatment with gene therapy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:398-427.
22.    Herzog RW, Cao O, Srivastava A. Two decades of clinical gene therapy: success is finally mounting. Discov Med. 2010;9:105-111.
23.    Stein L, Roy K, Lei L, Kaushal, S. Clinical gene therapy for the treatment of RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2011;11:429-439.
24.    Han Z, Conley SM, Makkia RS, Cooper MJ, Naash MI. DNA nanoparticle-mediated ABCA4 delivery rescues Stargardt dystrophy in mice. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3221-3226.
25.    Kollen WJ, Mulberg AE, Wei X, Sugita M, Raghuram V, Wang J, Foskett JK, Glick MC, Scanlin TF. High efficiency transfer of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator cDNA into cystic fibrosis airway cells in culture using lactosylated polylysine as a vector. Hum Gene Ther. 1999;10:615-622.
26.    Bragonzi A, Dina G, Villa A, Calori G, Biffi A, Bordignon C, Assael BM, Conese M. Biodistribution and transgene expression with nonviral cationic vector/DNA complexes in the lungs. Gene Ther. 2000;7:1753-1760.
27.    Fink TL, Klepcyk PJ, Oette SM, Gedeon CR, Hyatt SL, Kowalczyk TH, Moen RC, Cooper MJ. Plasmid size up to 20 kbp does not limit effective in vivo lung gene transfer using compacted DNA nanoparticles. Gene Ther. 2006;13:1048-1051.  
28.    Ziady AG, Gedeon CR, Muhammad O, Stillwell V, Oette SM, Fink TL, Quan W, Kowalczyk TH, Hyatt SL, Payne J, Peischl A, Seng JE, Moen RC, Cooper MJ, Davis PB. Minimal toxicity of stabilized compacted DNA nanoparticles in the murine lung. Mol Ther. 2003;8:948-956.
29.    Han Z, Conley SM, Makkia R, Guo J, Cooper MJ, Naash MI. Comparative analysis of DNA nanoparticles and AAVs for ocular gene delivery. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52189.
30.    Liang FQ, Anand V, Maguire AM, Bennett J. Intraocular delivery of recombinant virus. In: Rakoczy PE, ed. Methods in Molecular Medicine: Ocular Molecular Biology Protocols. Humana Press. Inc; Totowa, NJ; 2000:125-139.
31.    Cai X, Conley SM, Naash MI. RPE65: role inthe visual cycle, human retinal disease, and gene therapy. Ophthalmic Genet. 2009;30:57-62.
32.    Redmond TM, Yu S, Lee E, Bok D, Hamasaki D, Chen N, Goletz P, Ma JX, Crouch RK, Pfeifer K. Rpe65 is necessary for production of 11-cis-vitamin A in the retinal visual cycle. Nat Genet. 1998;20:344-351.  
33.    Li X, Li W, Dai X, Kong F, Zheng Q, Zhou X, Lü F, Chang B, Rohrer B, Hauswirth WW, Qu J, Pang JJ. Gene therapy rescues cone structure and function in the 3-month-old rd12 mouse: a model for midcourse RPE65 leber congenital amaurosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;5;52:7-15.
34.    Bennicelli J, Wright JF, Komaromy A, Jacobs JB, Hauck B, Zelenaia O, Mingozzi F, Hui D, Chung D, Rex TS, Wei Z, Qu G, Zhou S, Zeiss C, Arruda VR, Acland GM,Dell’Osso LF, High KA, Maguire AM, Bennett J. Reversal of blindness in animal models of leber congenital amaurosis using optimized AAV2-mediated gene transfer. Mol Ther. 2008;16:458-465.
35.    Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Ray J, Zhang Q, Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Pearce-Kelling SE, Anand V, Zeng Y, Maguire AM, Jacobson SG, Hauswirth WW, Bennett J. Gene therapy restores vision in a canine model of childhood blindness. Nat Genet. 2001;28:92-95.
36.    Stieger K, Lhériteau E, Moullier P, Rolling F. AAV-mediated gene therapy for retinal disorders inlarge animal models. ILAR J. 2009;50:206-224.
37.    Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Bennett J, Aleman TS, Cideciyan AV, Bennicelli J, Dejneka NS, Pearce-Kelling SE, Maguire AM, Palczewski K, Hauswirth WW, Jacobson SG. Long-term restoration of rod and cone vision by single dose rAAV-mediated gene transfer to the retina in a canine model of childhood blindness. Mol Ther. 2005;12:1072-1082.
38.    Le Meur G, Stieger K, Smith AJ, Weber M, Deschamps JY, Nivard D, Mendes-Madeira A, Provost N, Péréon Y, Cherel Y, Ali RR, Hamel C, Moullier P, Rolling F. Restoration of vision in RPE65-deficient Briard dogs using an AAV serotype 4 vector that specifically targets the retinal pigmented epithelium. Gene Ther. 2007;14:292-303.
39.    Narfström K, Vaegan, Katz M, Bragadottir R, Rakoczy EP, Seeliger M. Assessment of structure and function over a 3-year period after gene transfer in RPE65−/− dogs. Doc Ophthalmol. 2005;111:39-48.  
40.    Aguirre GK, Komaromy AM, Cideciyan AV, Brainard DH, Aleman TS, Roman AJ, Avants BB, Gee JC, Korczykowski M, Hauswirth WW, Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Jacobson SG. Canine and human visual cortex intact and responsive despite early retinal blindness from RPE65 mutation. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e230.  
41.    Jacobson SG, Acland GM, Aguirre GD, Aleman TS, Schwartz SB, Cideciyan AV, Zeiss CJ, Komaromy AM, Kaushal S, Roman AJ, Windsor EA, Sumaroka A, Pearce-Kelling SE, Conlon TJ, Chiodo VA, Boye SL, Flotte TR, Maguire AM, Bennett J, Hauswirth WW. Safety of recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2-RPE65 vector delivered by ocular subretinal injection. Mol Ther. 2006;13:1074-1084.  
42.    Simonelli F, Maguire AM, Testa F, Pierce EA, Mingozzi F, Bennicelli JL, Rossi S, Marshall K, Banfi S, Surace EM, Sun J, Redmond TM, Zhu X, Shindler KS, Ying GS, Ziviello C, Acerra C, Wright JF, McDonnell JW, High KA, Bennett J, Auricchio A. Gene therapy for Leber’s congenital amaurosis is safe and effective through 1.5 years after vector administration. Mol Ther. 2010;18:643-650.
43.    Testa F, Maguire AM, Rossi S, Pierce EA, Melillo P, Marshall K, Banfi S. Surace EM, Sun J, Acerra C, Wright JF, Wellman J, High KA, Auricchio A, Bennett J, Simonelli F. Three Year Follow-Up after Unilateral Subretinal Delivery of Adeno-Associated Virus in Patients with Leber Congenital Amaurosis Type 2. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1283-1291.
44.    Bainbridge JW, Mehat MS, Sundaram V, Robbie SJ, Barker SE, Ripamonti C, Georgiadis A, Mowat FM, Beattie SG, Gardner PJ, Feathers KL, Luong VA, Yzer S, Balaggan K, Viswanathan A, de Ravel TJ, Casteels I, Holder GE, Tyler N, Fitzke FW, Weleber RG, Nardini M, Moore AT, Thompson DA, Petersen-Jones SM, Michaelides M, van den Born LI, Stockman A, Smith AJ, Rubin G, Ali RR. Long-Term Effect of Gene Therapy on Leber’s Congenital Amaurosis. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1887-1897.
45.    Jacobson SG, Cideciyan AV, Ratnakaram R, Heon E, Schwartz SB, Roman AJ, Peden MC, Aleman TS, Boye SL, Sumaroka A, Conlon TJ, Calcedo R, Pang JJ, Erger KE, Olivares MB, Mullins CL, Swider M, Kaushal S, Feuer WJ, Iannaccone A, Fishman GA, Stone EM, Byrne BJ, Hauswirth WW. Gene Therapy for Leber Congenital Amaurosis caused by RPE65 mutations: Safety and Efficacy in 15 Children and Adults Followed up to 3 Years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:9-24.
46.    Mao H, Gorbatyuk MS, Rossmiller B, Hauswirth WW, Lewin AS. Long-term rescue of retinal structure and function by rhodopsin RNA replacement with a single adeno-associated viral vector in P23H RHO transgenic mice. Hum Gene Ther. 2012;23:356-366.
47.    Gwiazda S, Salomon K, Appel B, Müller S. RNA self-ligation: from oligonucleotides to full length ribozymes. Biochimie. 2012;94:1457-1463.
48.    Lewin AS, Drenser KA, Hauswirth WW, Nishikawa S, Yasumura D, Flannery JG, LaVail MM. Ribozyme rescue of photoreceptor cells in a transgenic rat model of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. Nat Med. 1998;4:967-971.
49.    LaVail MM, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, Drenser KA, Flannery JG, Lewin AS, Hauswirth WW. Ribozyme rescue of photoreceptor cells in P23H transgenic rats: long-term survival and late-stage therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:11488-11493.
50.    Hauswirth WW, Lewin AS. Ribozyme uses in retinal gene therapy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:689-710.
51.    Nagatsu T, Parvez SH, Bertolotti Roger. Progress in gene therapy: basic and clinical frontiers. Leiden:VSP; 2000.
52.    Hays Dustin C. Canine study puts gene therapy for X-linked retinitis pigmentosa in sight.National Eye Institute.<http://www.nei.nih.gov>; 28.06.12. 12. Ghosh,Pallab.Gene
53.    Duncan JL, LaVail MM, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, Yang H, Trautmann N, Chappelow AV, Feng W, Earp HS, Matsushima GK, Vollrath D. An RCS-like retinal dystrophy phenotype in Mer knockout mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:826-838.
54.    LaVail MM, Yasumura D, Matthes MT, Yang H, Hauswirth WW, Deng WT, Vollrath D Gene Therapy for MERTK-Associated Retinal Degenerations. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;854:487-493.
55.    Naash, Muna. Nanoparticle-based gene therapy preserves vision in lab study for Stargardt disease. Foundation Fighting Blindness. Web: <http://www.blindness.org>; 22.07.12.
56.    Nonviral DNA nanoparticles for ocular gene therapy totreat Stargardt’s disease. SciBX 5(34);doi:10.1038/scibx.2012.911.Aug. 30 2012.
57.    Parker MA, Choi D, Erker LR, Pennesi ME, Yang P, Chegarnov EN, Steinkamp PN, Schlechter CL, Dhaenens CM, Mohand-Said S, Audo I, Sahel J, Weleber RG, Wilson DJ. Test-Retest Variability of Functional and Structural Parameters in Patients with Stargardt Disease Participating in the SAR422459 Gene Therapy Trial. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5:10.
58.    Gullagher KS. Gene therapy shows promise against age-related macular degeneration. April 29,2011. Web:<http://now.tufts.edu>; 11.05.12.
59.    Rakoczy EP, Lai CM, Magno AL, Wikstrom ME, French ME, Pierce CM, Schwartz SD, Blumenkranz MS, Chalberg TW, Degli-Esposti MA, Constable IJ. Gene therapy with recombinant adeno-associated vectors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1 year follow-up of a phase 1 randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2015;386:2395-2403.
60.    Constable IJ, Blumenkranz MS, Schwartz SD, Barone S, Lai CM, Rakoczy EP. Gene Therapy for Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016;5:300-303.
61.    MacLaren RE, Groppe M, Barnard AR, Cottriall CL, Tolmachova T, Seymour L, Clark KR, During MJ, Cremers FP, Black GC, Lotery AJ, Downes SM, Webster AR, Seabra MC. Retinal gene therapy in patients with choroideremia: initial findings from a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Lancet. 2014;383:1129-1137.